Happy Wednesday and welcome back to On The Money, where we're hoping to emerge from the great Twitter purge unscathed. I'm Sylvan Lane, and here's your nightly guide to everything affecting your bills, bank account and bottom line. See something I missed? Let me know at slane@thehill.com or tweet me @SylvanLane. And if you like your newsletter, you can subscribe to it here: http://bit.ly/1NxxW2N. Write us with tips, suggestions and news: slane@thehill.com, vneedham@thehill.com, njagoda@thehill.com and nelis@thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @SylvanLane, @VickofTheHill, @NJagoda and @NivElis. THE BIG DEAL: Lawmakers and business groups were on edge Wednesday after President Trump announced plans to impose tariffs on $200 billion more in Chinese goods. The Trump administration said it will look at slapping tariffs of $200 billion on Chinese products over Beijing's failure to respond to U.S. efforts to get them to change their trade practices. The new list comes days after the U.S. levied a 25 percent tariff on $34 billion in Chinese imports, which resulted in retaliatory tariffs by Beijing of the same amount against U.S. goods. The tariffs would hit a wide range of Chinese products from tuna, cobia and swordfish, to vegetables, nuts, fruits and various minerals. The Hill's Vicki Needham tells us about what comes next here. Lawmakers from both parties spoke out against the escalation of trade tensions with China, and called Trump's new tariffs an unhelpful and dangerous response to legitimate concerns with Beijing. GOP Rep. Kevin Brady, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, called on Trump to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping to work out a permanent end to the retaliation. "It's clear the escalating trade dispute with China will go one of two ways – a long, multi-year trade war between the two largest economies in the world that engulfs more and more of the globe, or a deliberate decision by President Trump and President XI to meet and begin crafting an agreement that levels the playing field between China and the U.S. for local farmers, workers and businesses," Brady said in a statement. The Trump administration said the $200 billion in tariffs on Chinese products is necessary because of Beijing's failure to change what they consider a long history of unfair trade practices. But the fight drew ire from technology, manufacturing, agriculture and retailing groups, which argue that Trump's tariffs will hurt U.S. consumers and businesses.
Critics such as Dean Garfield, president and CEO of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) that represents companies such as Apple and Google, argue they don't see a real strategy. He faulted the administration for imposing more tariffs "without a clear objective or end in sight, threatening American jobs, stifling economic investment and increasing the prices of everyday goods." David French, senior vice president for government relations at the National Retail Federation, said another $200 billion in tariffs "doubles down on a reckless strategy that will boomerang back to harm U.S. families and workers." "The administration has been pursuing tariffs now for months and we still don't know what the endgame is," he said. Vicki has more on their concerns here. Reactions: - "The last thing America's manufacturing workers need is an escalating trade war." Jay Timmons, president and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers.
- "These tariffs needlessly hurt soy growers and rural communities." American Soybean Association president John Heisdorffer.
- "This action falls short of a strategy that will give the administration negotiating leverage with China while maintaining the long-term health and prosperity of the American economy." Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
- "If [Trump] takes his competitor to the brink and doesn't go over the brink, we're going to get a better deal. But if he goes over the brink it's going to be catastrophic." Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa.).
|
沒有留言:
張貼留言