網頁

2018年4月19日 星期四

Overnight Defense: Trump steps up fight with California over guard deployment | Heitkamp is first Dem to back Pompeo for State | Dems question legality of Syria strikes

 
 
View in your browser
 
The Hill Defense
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email
 

Happy Thursday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I'm Ellen Mitchell, and here's your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond.

 

THE TOPLINE: President Trump lashed out at California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) on Thursday, accusing Brown of sending his state's National Guard to the U.S.-Mexico border "to do nothing" and insisting that the federal government would not pay for the deployment.

"Governor Jerry Brown announced he will deploy 'up to 400 National Guard Troops' to do nothing," Trump tweeted. "The crime rate in California is high enough, and the Federal Government will not be paying for Governor Brown's charade. We need border security and action, not words!"

 

The background: Brown last week said he would accept federal funding to add 400 California Guardsmen, but insisted the troops not be used for immigration enforcement.

Defense and Customs and Border Patrol officials were hopeful Monday that those troops could instead be used in a later phase of the border mission and that talks between the state and federal government were ongoing. 

But talks seemed to have gone well after Brown said Wednesday night that the Trump administration agreed to fund the deployment of the potentially 400 guardsmen – focused specifically on combating criminal gangs, human trafficking and drug and gun crimes along the border, the California coast and within the state.

 

Hold on. Nothing has changed, governor says: In response to Trump's tweet, the California Guard on Thursday afternoon wrote on Twitter that they had received "written confirmation from the Pentagon that it'll continue to fund" the California Guard mission and personnel mobilized to combat transnational crime consistent with the order issued by Brown.

 

HEITKAMP FIRST DEM TO BACK POMPEO: Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) said Thursday that she will support  Trump's nomination of CIA Director Mike Pompeo as secretary of State, becoming the first Senate Democrat to announce back him.

"The role of the State Department is to support our diplomatic missions to avoid conflict, support American interests, and stand up for our allies, and having a leadership team in place is essential to carrying out those jobs," she said in a statement.

 

What it means: Heitkamp's backing virtually guarantees Pomepeo will win confirmation.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) opposes Pompeo's nomination and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has been absent, leaving Republicans with a maximum of 49 votes for his confirmation. Heitkamp's vote would get them to 50, the simple majority needed to be confirmed.  

 

Why she backed him: Heitkamp was one of 15 Democrats, including Independent Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who supported Pompeo's nomination last year to be secretary of State.

This fall she faces a difficult reelection race in a state Trump won by double-digits. Support for Pompeo could win her points from more conservative voters. 

Heitkamp on Thursday said that she decided to vote for Pompeo because he showed that he is "committed to empowering" State Department diplomats after the agency's morale took a hit under former secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Tillerson tried to restructure and cut staffing at the department, moves unpopular with State employees.

 

TOP DEMS DEMANDS ANSWERS ON LEGALITY OF SYRIA STRIKES: Sen. Tim Kaine (Va.) and House Intelligence Committee ranking member Adam Schiff (Calif.) sent a letter to Trump Thursday demanding he give the legal justification used to carry out the strikes last week on three Syrian chemical weapons facilities.

Trump provided a letter to Congress on Sunday that stated he ordered the strikes under Article II, the president's constitutional authority to use military force to protect the national interest from immediate threats.

"This is not sufficient information for the American public to understand what limits, if any, you and your Administration believes constrains you as the President from taking military action anywhere in the world for any purpose," Schiff and Kaine contend.

 

What they want: Schiff and Kaine's want "a full legal justification for strikes under domestic and international law to the Congress or the American people."

They also urged Trump to release a memo created by his administration that lays out the legality of the 2017 Syrian airbase strike.

"We are highly dismayed that despite our repeated requests, the Administration has refused to make it available to Congress," the two write, referring to the memo.

"This lengthy, largely unclassified memo and any additional legal analysis underpinning the 2018 strikes must be provided to Congress immediately."

 

Syria could still launch another chemical attack: The legality of the strikes seems all the more pressing as Pentagon official on Thursday said the Syrian government still has limited ability to launch a future chemical weapons attack.

Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Kenneth McKenzie told reporters the government of President Bashar Assad retains "a residual capability" to conduct an attack, "probably spread throughout the country at a variety of sites."

"They will have the ability to conduct limited attacks in the future. I would not rule that out. However, as they contemplate the dynamics of conducting those attacks, they've got to look over their shoulder and be worried that we're looking at them and we'll have the ability to strike them again should it be necessary," McKenzie added.

 

TRUMP'S CYBER WAR STRATEGY: President Trump sent Congress a long-awaited report on U.S. policy for deterring and responding to attacks in cyberspace. Lawmakers from both parties have been pressing the administration for a comprehensive cyber strategy for several months.

 

What we know. The policy was sent to the House and Senate committees with oversight of the departments of State, Homeland Security, Defense and Justice, according to a letter released Thursday by the White House.

 

But no public details. The text of the letter sent Thursday contains no clues about the actual contents of the report. An aide to the Senate Armed Services Committee told The Hill that the document is classified.

 

ON TAP FOR TOMORROW

Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson will speak on increasing the service's lethality at 10 a.m. at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C.

 

ICYMI:

-- The Hill: Following US strikes in Syria, Israel concerned by new Russian weapons

-- The Hill: Navy, Marines chiefs say no morale issues with transgender troops

-- The Hill: Mnuchin on Haley's Russia sanctions comments: 'She wasn't left twisting in the wind'

-- The Hill: South Korea: North Korea 'expressing a will for complete denuclearization'

-- The Hill: Pompeo, Kim discussed 3 US citizens held in North Korea: report

-- Defense News: US Army stops accepting AH-64E helicopters from Boeing in 'critical safety' row

 
 

Please send tips and comments to Rebecca Kheel, rkheel@thehill.com, and Ellen Mitchell, emitchell@thehill.com.

Follow us on Twitter: @thehill@Rebecca_H_K@EllenMitchell23

 
 
 
 
  Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email  
 
Did a friend forward you this email?
Sign up for Defense Newsletters  
 
 
 
 
 
THE HILL
 
Privacy Policy  |  Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe  |  Email to a friend  |  Sign Up for Other Newsletters
 
The Hill 1625 K Street, NW 9th Floor, Washington DC 20006
©2016 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.
 
 

Overnight Health Care: Maternal deaths rising in US | Judge rules against Trump officials for ending teen pregnancy funds | Rep. Ann McLane Kuster on her sibling's struggle with opioids

 
 
View in your browser
 
The Hill Healthcare
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email
 

Welcome to Thursday's Overnight Health Care. Congress is laser-focused on the opioid epidemic, welcome news for advocates on the issue. But that's also pushing other issues, like the dismal maternal mortality rate, on the backburner. Keep reading...

 

Two bipartisan bills stuck in committee for about a year could make a difference in helping the U.S. understand, and eventually solve, its maternal mortality crisis.

The bills, sponsored by Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) in the House and Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) in the Senate, would support state-level efforts to form review committees that specifically track and investigate pregnancy-related deaths, and then look for ways to prevent future deaths from occurring.

Despite having no organized opposition from members of Congress or outside groups, the bill hasn't had a hearing, moved out of committee or been scheduled for a vote. It has 107 co-sponsors in the House, including 23 Republicans.

 

What happens next? There's some talk the bill might be added through a manager's amendment to the opioids package the Senate health committee will vote on next week. It's not clear if the House will take the same approach, however. Asked for a timeline on Herrera Beutler's bill in the House, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden (R-Ore.) said: "I know it's an issue, and we're just so focused on opioids right now."

Read more here.

 

A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration Thursday in a case focused on the early termination of Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program grants.

Last summer, the administration notified 81 organizations that their five-year grants through the program would end in 2018, rather than in 2020, prompting multiple lawsuits.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson ruled in one of those cases Thursday, ordering the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to accept and process applications of four grantees as if they had not been terminated.

 

What it means: From Sean Sherman, the attorney who represented the four groups: "We hope that the courts presiding over the 3 other cases that have been filed will follow this decision, and that other grantees will rely on it to challenge HHS's termination of their grants. At this point, however, there is no direct impact on grantees other than our four clients.

Read more here.

 
 

The fourth of The Hill's Close to Home series on opioids, presented by Partnership for Safe Medicines, talked to Rep. Ann McLane Kuster (D-N.H.) about her brother's struggle with an opioid addiction.

In 2015, Kuster co-founded the House Bipartisan Heroin Task Force.

A year later, her brother developed an opioid addiction. 

Seeking a national response to opioid abuse was far different than caring for a sibling with an addiction. Kuster and her three siblings took turns traveling across the country to care for him. They tried to figure out what to do, but, at times, it felt like there wasn't a right answer.



Key quote: "You deal with trust issues in the family. We didn't know whether to trust him. I can remember so many phone calls just wanting to believe what he was saying, and then the evidence [of opioid misuse] would prove otherwise," Kuster said in an interview. 

The challenge: Lawmakers have heard story after story of patients becoming addicted to painkillers after surgery. How to prevent that from happening has become a key question in their response to the opioid epidemic. 

Read more here.

 
 

More on opioids... HHS released the second year of opioid grants for states.

The $485 million was awarded to 50 states and four U.S. territories, as well as the Palau and Micronesia.

"These funds will help support evidence-based efforts at the state level to prevent misuse of opioids in the first place, expand access to effective treatment options for people in need, and support recovery for those who have prevailed," HHS secretary Alex Azar said in a statement.

The grants were created in 2016.

 

All 24 Democrats on the Energy & Commerce Committee are demanding HHS reinstate Obama-era Medicaid guidance aimed at protecting Planned Parenthood.

HHS rescinded this guidance in January, arguing that it was part of the Obama administration's effort to favor abortion rights.

Democrats: "Limiting access to qualified family planning providers solely for ideological reasons separate from their ability to provide care harms patients and restricts women from making their own health care decisions."

Read the letter here.

 

Meanwhile over in the Senate, a first.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) took advantage of a new Senate rule to bring her infant daughter to the chamber's floor with her when she cast a vote.

Why was this such a big deal? Until Wednesday, the Senate didn't allow any children onto the floor. Congress's upper chamber is notorious for strict rules from decorum to attire. Senators on Wednesday voted by unanimous consent to change those rules. Some GOP senators though had raised concerns about the change.

Any senator can now bring a child younger than one to the floor during votes.

Duckworth on Thursday jokingly asked about the chamber's policy on "duckling onesies" before bringing her newborn daughter to the floor.

 

What we're reading

GOP will tout individual mandate repeal, but it could backfire (Axios)

How an opioid deadlier than heroin became off limits for researchers (Bloomberg)

NIH abruptly changes course on industry opioids partnership after ethics flags raised (Stat)

 

State by state

Michigan Senate OKs Medicaid work requirement (Detroit News)

Rick Scott's Medicaid numbers come under fire in Florida (Tampa Bay Times)

Feds again deny Oklahoma's attempt to use Medicaid funds to train doctors (NPR Oklahoma)

Two charged with forging signatures on Medicaid expansion ballot petition (Deseret News)

 
 

Send tips and comments to Jessie Hellmann, jhellmann@thehill.com; Peter Sullivan, psullivan@thehill.com; Rachel Roubein, rroubein@thehill.com; and Nathaniel Weixel, nweixel@thehill.com.

Follow us on Twitter: @thehill@jessiehellmann@PeterSullivan4@rachel_roubein, and @NateWeixel.

 
 
 
 
  Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email  
 
Did a friend forward you this email?
Sign up for Healthcare Newsletters  
 
 
 
 
 
THE HILL
 
Privacy Policy  |  Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe  |  Email to a friend  |  Sign Up for Other Newsletters
 
The Hill 1625 K Street, NW 9th Floor, Washington DC 20006
©2016 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.
 
 

Overnight Cybersecurity: Staff changes upend White House cyber team | Trump sends cyber war strategy to Congress | CIA pick to get hearing in May | Malware hits Facebook accounts

 
 
View in your browser
 
The Hill Cybersecurity
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email
 
 

Welcome to OVERNIGHT CYBERSECURITY, your daily rundown of the biggest news in the world of hacking and data privacy. We're here to connect the dots as leaders in government, policy and industry try to counter the rise in cyber threats. What lies ahead for Congress, the administration and the latest company under siege? Whether you're a consumer, a techie or a D.C. lifer, we're here to give you ...

 

THE BIG STORIES: 

STAFF CHANGES UPEND WHITE HOUSE CYBER TEAM: The White House cybersecurity team is undergoing a major shuffle that former officials say could jeopardize the administration's efforts to develop cyber policy and punish hackers for disruptive attacks. President Trump's cybersecurity coordinator, Rob Joyce, revealed this week that he would vacate his post and return to the National Security Agency (NSA), ending a 14-month stint at the White House. News of his planned departure came less than a week after the resignation of homeland security adviser Tom Bossert.

The two men had become the face of the White House's cybersecurity efforts, providing a line of communication between lawmakers and private industry to the West Wing. The shakeup has created a new challenge for the Trump administration at a time when cyber threats abound.

"Certainly, there's no question that between Bossert's departure and Rob's departure that it's going to slow down policy development work and cause disruption," said Michael Daniel, who served as cybersecurity coordinator under the Obama administration. The changes give new national security adviser John Bolton the opportunity to remake the National Security Council (NSC) to his liking, raising questions about who he will choose to fill the positions and whether he will restructure the roles.

 

OVER THE COURSE of a year, both officials fostered relationships with private sector cyber companies. They also worked with foreign governments to publicly attribute cyberattacks. Bossert, for instance, stepped out onto the White House podium last December to blame North Korea for the global WannaCry malware attack.

 

The main takeaways: The shakeup has many in industry worried.

"Both Tom and Rob leaving is a significant problem for private sector engagement on cybersecurity issues," said one lobbyist who works in the cybersecurity space. "As companies worry about cyberattacks right now, people are asking, 'Who should I call?' " the source said. "Since this administration started, the first call has often been to one of those two."

There is also broad agreement among former officials that it will be difficult to find suitable replacements, especially for Joyce, given his wealth of experience at NSA.

To read more, click here.

 

WHITE HOUSE SENDS CYBER WAR STRATEGY TO CONGRESS: President Trump has sent Congress a long-awaited report on U.S. policy for deterring and responding to attacks in cyberspace.

The policy was sent to the House and Senate committees with oversight of the Departments of State, Homeland Security, Defense, and Justice, according to a letter released Thursday by the White House.

An annual defense policy law approved last year mandates that Trump develop a national policy for cyberspace and cyberwarfare. The president strongly objected to the provision at the time because it made funding for the White House Communications Agency (WHCA) contingent on him producing the strategy.

The text of the letter sent Thursday contains no clues about the actual contents of the report. An aide to the Senate Armed Services Committee told The Hill that the document is classified.

 

Why it's a big deal: Lawmakers have raised concerns for successive administrations about the lack of a comprehensive policy on deterring and responding to aggression in cyberspace.

In March, a bipartisan group of senators wrote to Trump that he should issue the strategy as soon as possible, arguing that the lack of clearly spelled out consequences for cyberattacks "has served as an open invitation to foreign adversaries and malicious cyber actors to continue attacking the United States."

To read more, click here.

 

A CONFIRMATION UPDATE:

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) announced Thursday that the committee will hold a hearing on the confirmation of Gina Haspel to be President Trump's CIA director.

The hearing, which will be conducted in an open setting, will take place on May 9, Burr said. The announcement comes as Haspel continues to undergo scrutiny for her role in the intelligence agency's torture program.

"Unless the CIA declassifies and makes public specific information about Gina Haspel's background, proceeding with this hearing will make a mockery of the Senate's constitutional responsibilities with regard to nominations," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the Intelligence Committee said in a statement.

"There is critical information about Ms. Haspel's background that the American people need to see, and that can be declassified without compromising sources and methods. Agreeing to the CIA's cover-up and pushing ahead with this nomination represents a true abdication of the Senate's oversight role," Wyden said.

Haspel would replace current CIA chief Mike Pompeo, whom Trump has tapped to serve as secretary of State. 

 

... AND AN UPDATE FROM THE COURTS: 

MUELLER'S AUTHORITY. A federal judge on Thursday questioned whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) gave special counsel Robert Mueller more authority to conduct his federal probe Russian interference in the 2016 election than the agency's rules allow.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson questioned whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's order to appoint Mueller granted him more authority than DOJ regulations appear to permit, after Manafort's counsel pointed out how Rosenstein's order in May said the special counsel can look into anything of consequence that "arose or may arise" in his investigation.

Trump's former campaign manager sued the DOJ and the special counsel's office in January in an effort to block Mueller's team from carrying out future prosecutions against him, arguing that Mueller has gone beyond the scope of his investigation. Manafort's lead defense attorney, Kevin Downing, argued that Rosenstein -- who appointed Mueller -- did not clearly specify what could or could not be examined, giving the special counsel free rein to investigate a broad swath of issues. This, he said, has led the special counsel to begin looking into old allegations that extend beyond his investigation's jurisdiction and authority.

Downing said that contradicts Justice's regulations, which maintain that the directive given to a special counsel must include specific factual matter about their investigation.

While the argument appeared to get some traction with the judge, it is unclear whether it will sway her ruling in the civil case. Jackson is also presiding over Manafort's criminal case.

To read more from our piece, click here.

 

MALWARE IN FOCUS: 

THOUSANDS OF FACEBOOK ACCOUNTS INFECTED: Hackers have successfully infiltrated tens of thousands of Facebook accounts by targeting users with malware disguised as a painting application, security researchers say.

According to data security firm Radware, hackers are using the malware to harvest user credentials, payment methods and other information stored on Facebook accounts across the world.

The malware masquerades as a painting application called Relieve Stress Paint and had infected more than 40,000 Facebook user accounts in a matter of days, the firm said Wednesday.

The revelation could create a new headache for Facebook, which has been under scrutiny for its data privacy practices following news that Cambridge Analytica improperly harvested data on some 87 million of its users. CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress on the issue last week.

Facebook said it is currently investigating the malware issue.

"We are investigating these malware findings and we are taking steps to help protect and notify those who are impacted," Facebook communications manager Pete Voss told The Hill.

According to Radware, hackers are targeting Facebook users through phishing emails or directly through their Facebook accounts, then directing them to a fraudulent website where they are prompted to download the malicious application.

Once downloaded, the application runs a malware called Stresspaint in the background, allowing hackers to steal user credentials and use those to collect additional data on the accounts, such as the number of friends a user has or any payment method that may be stored on the account.

 

Why it's notable: The researchers, who discovered the malicious activity last week, say that the high infection rate of the malware indicates that it was developed professionally.

To read more from our piece, click here.

 

A LIGHTER (TWITTER) CLICK: 

Now that's just gross.

 

WHAT'S IN THE SPOTLIGHT (WELL, WHEN ISN'T IT?): 

ELECTION SECURITY: Identity security company Centrify conducted an onsite poll of 100 information technology professionals at the RSA conference in San Francisco this week, finding that the majority are concerned about the security of private data that is held by state Election Boards ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

Specifically, Centrify found that 67 percent of those polled expressed concern about the security of this data. Twenty-one percent also replied that they consider the integrity of voting places and machines to be the gravest threat to U.S. democracy ahead of the 2018 vote.

Election security has become a popular topic in and out of Washington following Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, which involved targeting of state and local voting systems. While none of the systems targeted or breached were involved in vote tallying, the revelations have nevertheless stirred fears that future hacks could undermine confidence in the vote, or tamper with it directly.  

In non-election security related revelations, roughly three in 10 respondents said that they stopped using the services of companies like Uber, Yahoo, and Equifax after they revealed security breaches.

 

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT:

Links from our blog, The Hill, and around the Web.

Heitkamp becomes first Dem to back Pompeo for secretary of State. (The Hill)

Facebook investigated over alleged housing discrimination. (The Hill)

AT&T CEO defends Time Warner merger in court. (The Hill)

Justice to provide access to Comey memos to GOP lawmakers. (The Hill)

OP-ED: Open data and protecting privacy -- We can do both. (The Hill)

Justice Dept inspector asks US attorney to consider criminal charges for McCabe: reports. (The Hill)

Files belonging to the Atlanta Police Department were wiped by hackers. (CBS 46)

There's a fight brewing over cyber jobs at the National Security Council. (CyberScoop)

Homeland Security wants to rid government mobile apps of malware. (NextGov)

Meet the hacker who stole info on 168 million people in a years-long spam operation. (Daily Beast)

If you'd like to receive our newsletter in your inbox, please sign up here.

 
 
 
 
 
  Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Email  
 
Did a friend forward you this email?
Sign up for Cybersecurity Newsletters  
 
 
 
 
 
THE HILL
 
Privacy Policy  |  Manage Subscriptions  |  Unsubscribe  |  Email to a friend  |  Sign Up for Other Newsletters
 
The Hill 1625 K Street, NW 9th Floor, Washington DC 20006
©2016 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.